“Our (optional) prompt for the day is to write a sijo. This is a traditional Korean poetic form. Like the haiku, it has three lines, but the lines are much longer. Typically, they are 14-16 syllables, and optimally each line will consist of two parts – like two sentences, or a sentence of two clauses divided by a comma. In terms of overall structure, a sijo functions like an abbreviated sonnet, in that the first line sets up an inquiry or discussion, the second line continues the discussion, and the third line resolves it with a “twist” or surprise. For more on the sijo, check out the primer here and a long list of examples in English, here.”
Conventional wisdom – my brashest, least-favorite oxymoron – blares at unseemly decibels saturating all possible outcomes with the loudest of laziest hindsights
suggesting through simplistic screeches that all rules are to be obeyed and never scrutinized, “don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time” and other nonsensical violations against critical thought,
since whoever conjured such banal ideas must have to cram day and night studying from rote books of trite cliches and empty platitudes, burning both ends of the candle,
giving one-hundred and ten percent in an all-or-nothing winner-take-all nice-guys-finish-last campaign just to be considered slightly above average dimwits who think about the box as an actual box when thinking outside of said box,
completely oblivious to his actual boxed-in nature, and no,
I’m not calling those types vapid, obtuse, or hilariously freed from reason and accountability – for I do not enjoy stating that which can be so easily observed by anyone familiar with the scientific method – I’m just
asking those braying hyenas and jackasses to pipe-down a moment so the rest of us can hear ourselves think.
“Today, I’d like to challenge you to write a humorous rant. In this poem, you may excoriate to your heart’s content all the things that get on your nerves. Perhaps it’s people who tailgate when driving, or don’t put the caps back on pens after they use them. Or the raccoons who get into your garbage cans. For inspiration, perhaps you might look to this list of Shakespearean insults. Or, for all of you who grew up on cartoons from the 1980s, perhaps this compendium of Skeletor’s Best Insults might provide some insight.”
I struggled a bit with this one. I had to keep my thoughts abstract because whenever I leaned into concrete and specific ideas, I found myself writing recklessly about things that could cause me problems if the wrong person read them, and conventional wisdom told me to play it safe, which made me really pissed at conventional wisdom for a few minutes, and I hate it when a poet or artist overexplains their art, especially via long, run-on sentences, don’t you?
Anyway, that’s how this particular sausage was made.
‘This one comes to us from Stephanie Malley, who challenges us to write a poem based on the title of one of the chpaters from Susan G. Wooldridge’s Poemcrazy: Freeing Your Life with Words. The book’s table of contents can be viewed using Amazon’s “Look inside” feature. Will you choose “the poem squash?” or perhaps “grocery weeping” or “the blue socks”? If none of the 60 rather wonderful chapter titles here inspire you, perhaps a chapter title from a favorite book would do? For example, the photo on my personal twitter account is a shot of a chapter title from a P.G. Wodehouse novel — the chapter title being “Sensational Occurrence at a Poetry Reading.”’
I chose “Derivative” which is the title of the seventh chapter of the novel Free Food for Millionaires, by Min Jin Lee. I chose it because I’m actively reading it and I found the coincidental irony of this choice too kooky to pass up. I mean, that’s literally the chapter where my bookmark now lies.
P.S. – I’m currently still reading it, so don’t tell me what happens next, ok?
“For better or worse, the moon seems to exert a powerful hold on poets, as this large collection of moon-themed poems suggests. Today, I’d like to challenge you to stop fighting the moon. Lean in. Accept the moon. The moon just wants what’s best for you and your poems. So yes – write a poem that is about, or that involves, the moon.”
I do find myself writing about the moon a lot. This time I want with a deconstruction of sorts.
*Writer’s note: In the past I would have tried to make up the lost days, but this time I decided to let depression have its pound of flesh and just move on. Thanks for understanding.
Gaelic in origin, Barry probably means good enough, if not boring, dull, or quick to bail on patriarchal pursuits, as I gave up on reading the bone-dry etymology four sentences in.
That’s a half-truth, but even patrons who came up with it felt it was good enough, surrendering midway, saying it might mean “fair-headed, or maybe an Irish spear? Hell’s bells, I dunno; why ask me? Fuck you.”
Ask momma and she’d tell you that it means sweetie; ask grandma and she’d reply with stanka; ask anyone else and you’ll get other truthy-sounding observations.
The only important part is that I’m the fourth of my name, third to serve in the armed forces, second known to wildly wield sarcasm as a melee weapon, and first to clearly see the maze as well as my iron-clad limitations within.
Dawson means son of David, and David means beloved; loved by God, amen. Therefore, biblically-speaking, I guess that makes me a bit of a legacy kid, amen.
Favor onto me, descendent of slave and master, origin muddied, traced back to great divide, to Mississippi riverbed and no further, no deeper shall we tread.
In truth, all that can be gleaned from the name means it is unique enough to be known and when spoken in general earshot, I will know it is me you are seeking.
‘I’d like to challenge you to write a poem that delves into the meaning of your first or last name. Looking for inspiration? Take a look at this poem by Mark Wunderlich, appropriately titled “Wunderlich.”’
While I like this prompt, I feel like I’ve done it many times from the patriarchal angle, only to be frustrated that I can’t (or won’t) really go any deeper …
“Today’s prompt comes from the Instagram account of Sundress Publications, which posts a writing prompt every day, all year long. This one is short and sweet: write a poem in the form of a news article you wish would come out tomorrow.”
Another wait-n-see casualty epitaph-inscribed ellipses waking-sleep at the wheel watching his own eclipse from hermetically-sealed airlock objects in motion retain commotion unless acted upon by aging’s gravest drag and gravity fills complacency’s cavity feeble Van-Winkle-eyes strain and fail to read a copious account of all the proper names speeding past his bleeding orbit of last gasps and fading oxygen until there’s null
“I’m calling this one “Past and Future.” This prompt challenges you to write a poem using at least one word/concept/idea from each of two specialty dictionaries: Lempriere’s Classical Dictionary and the Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction. A hat tip to Cathy Park Hong for a tweet that pointed me to the science fiction dictionary and to Hoa Nguyen for introducing me to the Classical Dictionary.”
“This is a twist on a prompt offered by Kay Gabriel during a meeting she facilitated at the Poetry Project last year. Today, I’d like to challenge you to write a two-part poem, in the form of an exchange of letters. The first stanza (or part) should be in the form of a letter that you write either to yourself or to a famous fictional or historical person. The second part should be the letter you receive in response. These can be as short or long as you like, in the form of prose poems, or with line breaks – and of course, the subject matter of the letters is totally up to you.”
(You’ll have to click on the prompt link for the description.)
*Writer’s note: WordPress editor just ate my biting criticism of it, so just know that I am most displeased with it and I will be going back to my other site after NaPoWriMo ends.